This is an excellent idea. I am so going to spend some time over the summer and plan a couple of lessons like this. Great idea.
This is an excellent idea. I am so going to spend some time over the summer and plan a couple of lessons like this. Great idea.
I was recently reading on Leadershipfreak.com about three types of people you should surround yourself with as a leader.
The post was very interesting. Starting out with the statement “The enemy of success is isolation.” Now, this for sure applies to leaders but how about teachers in the classroom? Most teachers are in isolation. Rarely do they leave their room and they stay there for most of their career.
Are these teachers unsuccessful? I do not believe that they are totally but as cliche, as it sounds, it does take a village to raise a child. Teachers need to be getting out of their rooms as much as they can in order to network with other teachers from other disciplines. In order to be successful in the classroom, we must network together learning from one another.
tags: reading literacy education
Ten years in the classroom is now approaching. Last year I got adventurous with my professional goals and decided to link using Facebook as one of my goals. At first, I was scared about going down that road and so were many others, but it worked out just fine. This year I may have gone overboard….
Back in March, I had a reflection time that took me to a place that I felt was being a responsible educator, I examined how students were truly doing in my classes. From the first look it would appear they were doing great, and for the most part, they were. But there were some that were not performing at the level that their grade said they were.
At this time I decided to get even more adventurous. The State of Oregon recently adopted HB 2220 which defines proficiency and lays out the groundwork for schools districts to start implementing in the coming years. While our district is not based on proficiency, I took it upon myself to implement a full proficiency-based system in the classroom.
As the year progresses, I will be posting my trials and tribulations on this blog to share with all of you.
Some teachers say they use rubrics for everything and they do. Some of those rubrics that I have seen that they use are horrible and just thrown together without taking the learner into consideration nor do they even define the proficient level for each student.
Here is a post from ASCD about creating rubrics and online tools you can use to create yours.
Education Update:Planning for Processing Time Yields Deeper Learning:Guidelines for Creating Rubrics:
Identify the proficient level first. In a four-tier rubric, we recommend that teachers identify level 3 of the rubric first. This level is an acceptable score and shows proficiency at performing the task or understanding the content.
Build the rest of the rubric around proficiency. From this point, building the remainder of the rubric is fairly easy: a 1 shows minimal understanding or performance; a 2 shows some understanding/performance but with significant gaps; and a 4 shows an advanced level of understanding or performance.
Focus on growth. Finally, we recommend that if you use a 0 at all, it should state “Not enough evidence at this point to assess understanding.” This way, even scoring at the lowest level of the rubric sends students the message that their level of performance can be improved.
Michael Jordan was cut from his high school basketball team. Failure!
At 30 years old, Steve Jobs was forced to leave the company he build from the ground up. Failure!
Walt Disney was fired from a newspaper because he lacked “imagination” and “original ideas”. Failure!
Oprah Winfery was demoted from being a news anchor because she was “not fit enough for television”. Failure!
Albert Einstein could not speak until the age of 4 and teachers told him that he would not amount to much in life. Failure!
It is important for us as educators to let every student know that failure is just a rehearsal for success. Kids are worried about failing, and they should be, but when they do, and they will, they need to know that they are not failures as a person.
Traditional testing has become very degrading to those students who see a number that is not considered passing. But those same students could go out and fix my truck without much hesitation and go to work as a mechanic and make twice what I do. So which one is the failure, the student who has volumes more knowledge than I about mechanics of machines or me, the guys with two college degrees, two masters degrees, and an almost completed Ed.S?
This reminds me of a Big Bang Theory episode where all four guys were driving and something happened to Leonard’s car. He asked, ” Does anyone here know anything about the internal combustion engine?” Every one of them said, “Yes, tons.” “Does anyone here know how to work on the internal combustion engine?” Their reply, “Absolutely not!” That was three guys who all had terminal degrees and Wolowitz of course (BBT fans will know why that is funny) who had immense knowledge of many things in this world but could not even fix their car. Are they failures? I would say at that moment for that circumstance they were. Again, being a failure at some things is not bad. Failure is just a rehearsal for success. I fail regularly at taking out the trash and helping with the laundry, just ask my wife.
Flipping the classroom has become a large passion of mine. It is one of my ongoing professional goals to implement next year.
I have to agree with these four bullet points. Poor video lectures are worse than the live version of the same lecture. They need to be engaging.